Pixelated
Moderator - CPST Instructor
I've been pondering the various criteria for deciding who sits in the front if a situation called for it, and I'm looking for help thinking this out. I don't think the answer is necessarily the same in the US because of our requirement for top tethering a FF harnessed seat. Please weigh in.
So my choices are:
Oldest RF-er if airbag can be deactivated (this one's easy).
Oldest FF harnessed seat IF the seat can be temporary tethered or IF there is a designated TA point. Slide front seat all the way back whether there's an airbag or not. Argument for this option: the child is harnessed and therefore can't be out of position when the airbag deploys. Against: child is younger (probably) and therefore less skeletal development.
Oldest boostered child, with seat slid as far back as possible without compromising belt fit. Argument for this option: being on a booster elevates the child to better ride out the air bag deployment, and more skeletal development than a harnessed child (based on age). Against: more likely to be out of position.
Oldest 5-stepping child, with seat slid as far back as possible without compromising belt fit. Argument for this option: older child has more skeletal development. Against: more likely to be out of position.
What am I missing, and what would sway your decision one way or another?
So my choices are:
Oldest RF-er if airbag can be deactivated (this one's easy).
Oldest FF harnessed seat IF the seat can be temporary tethered or IF there is a designated TA point. Slide front seat all the way back whether there's an airbag or not. Argument for this option: the child is harnessed and therefore can't be out of position when the airbag deploys. Against: child is younger (probably) and therefore less skeletal development.
Oldest boostered child, with seat slid as far back as possible without compromising belt fit. Argument for this option: being on a booster elevates the child to better ride out the air bag deployment, and more skeletal development than a harnessed child (based on age). Against: more likely to be out of position.
Oldest 5-stepping child, with seat slid as far back as possible without compromising belt fit. Argument for this option: older child has more skeletal development. Against: more likely to be out of position.
What am I missing, and what would sway your decision one way or another?