grumpybear
New member
I am quite baffled by the SafeKids coordinator in our area.
I understand that we live in an area where you'd be lucky to see 3 year olds in a 5-point harness so it is quite difficult enough for the techs to be recommending best practice to these parents.
However, I know of some parents who would, no doubt, try or employ the best practice if it were recommended to them.
But why is it that our SK coordinator would recommend to my friend that she transfer her 4 year old in a high back booster when the child was still in a 5-point harness that still fit her?
Or even encourage me to turn my son around when she knows that I know that RF is safer and am willing to keep it that way 'til he reaches the limits of his seat?
Are there any legal implications that would keep techs from recommending best practice?
I understand that we live in an area where you'd be lucky to see 3 year olds in a 5-point harness so it is quite difficult enough for the techs to be recommending best practice to these parents.
However, I know of some parents who would, no doubt, try or employ the best practice if it were recommended to them.
But why is it that our SK coordinator would recommend to my friend that she transfer her 4 year old in a high back booster when the child was still in a 5-point harness that still fit her?
Or even encourage me to turn my son around when she knows that I know that RF is safer and am willing to keep it that way 'til he reaches the limits of his seat?
Are there any legal implications that would keep techs from recommending best practice?