Shanora
Well-known member
So I was talking to my DH about how I wished Canada would get on the ball and allow seats the RF to 35 Pounds. Cause its safer. Well it turns out DH has a HUGE aversion to having children older than 3 RF, due to them not being comfortable. He doesn't believe that a child would be comfortable with their legs either crossed or up on the seat for long periods of time (longer than 4 hours, and once we get posted we will do MANY trips longer than 4 hours). Myself personally...I care, but not at the risk of their safety.
He absolutely refused to allow one of our children (future ones...Ds#2 is to big for rf in Canada) to ride RF in HIS vehicle after they were 3-4 years of age. He said that they would be turned FF and if I wanted to I could continue to have them RF in MY vehicle.
He has no issues with Extended Harnessing(cause I brought up the harnessing until 6-7 years old thing).....AS long as the comfort of the child is taken into consideration.
He thinks that at some point comfort would out weight the safety aspect.
*sigh* I guess I just want to know if its worth the argument.....or if I should just let it lie right now, and just go along with my plans to ERF with my future children, and see where it goes.
He absolutely refused to allow one of our children (future ones...Ds#2 is to big for rf in Canada) to ride RF in HIS vehicle after they were 3-4 years of age. He said that they would be turned FF and if I wanted to I could continue to have them RF in MY vehicle.
He has no issues with Extended Harnessing(cause I brought up the harnessing until 6-7 years old thing).....AS long as the comfort of the child is taken into consideration.
He thinks that at some point comfort would out weight the safety aspect.
*sigh* I guess I just want to know if its worth the argument.....or if I should just let it lie right now, and just go along with my plans to ERF with my future children, and see where it goes.