Nedra
Car-Seat.org Ambassador
I'm completely torn between basically ALL of the Britax convertibles -- from the Roundabout to the Advocate . . . if the Decathalon was still around I'd probably be obsessed with it too. It seems like each one has something that draws me to it. Sometimes it's a feature, sometimes it's . . . (sigh) the lack of the very same feature. Yes, that's how mixed up and confused I am. It seems that the only thing I can fully wrap my head around is that I like the Laguna cover the best.
So, Britax convertible owners, which one did you pick and why? Are you happy with your decision?
I know which features each one has, so you don't need to feel obligated to explain the differences between the models. If there are fit/comfort issues that you have found, though, I'd be very interested in learning more about that.
I'm just mostly wondering how you made your decision and whether it worked out for you. What features were important to you and do you still find them as important in retrospect?
I appreciate any insights you can give. I can't tell you how much I value this community and all the patient advice that I get here. I know that my question is not new, but the ones that turned up in the search of this forum were all a couple years old and the seats have changed since then. Thanks for all you do!
EDIT
Okay, you've all been super amazing. Can I give you a few more details about our situation and see what you think?
Here are the features we're looking for:
Lightweight -- This is in favor of the Roundabout 50 Classic, right? That's the lightest, as far as I can tell from Britax's specs.
Rear-Facing Longevity -- Again in favor of the Roundabout Classic, since it's shell is an inch longer?
Easy-to-install -- Not in favor of the Classics, since they don't have the hole in the shell and cover for you to pull the belt through, right? Also the roundabout classic doesn't have lock-offs, but I'm not sure if we'd need those since we install with latch and I don't anticipate many situations where we'd be in a car so old it doesn't have a locking seatbelt. But you never know, I guess?
Easy-to-adjust -- It sounds like the harnesses are all about the same level of difficulty, but my husband is set on the click-and- safe feature (pavillion) because the seat will be in his parents' car and they have difficulty with knowing how much they need to tighten her current seat. But when I tried it out a floor model at BRU, it clicked WAY too early when the seat was installed in the car. When I plunked her in a G3 a few months ago, it was PERFECT. But I think I was also trying it out with the straps above her shoulders. Maybe when they are below it doesn't work as well? I don't want to give my in-laws a false sense of security.
Side Impact protection -- The seat will be installed outboard. The Marathons and Roundabouts all have side impact protection from their sidewalls -- are these all equivalent, though? The pictures make their sidewalls all seem to be of different depths. Also, does the "true side impact protection" in the headrest really make a difference if the kiddo is rear-facing (and therefore their head isn't above the seat anyway)? My MIL also usually likes to ride in back with her, and so the protection to her from the SICT cushions seems like a good idea, although the advocate seems like a pain.
Easy-to-load -- I am guessing that this is in direct competition with the side impact criterion but my baby is at an age where it is a struggle to get her into her car seat. She arches her back and is very resistant. She's fine once she's in it, but she's a determined little thing when you're trying to load her. This is true even though right now she's in an infant seat and we can sit right in front of her. I have no idea how we'll manage a convertible! So anything that makes loading easier (ez buckle belly pad? Harness holders?) seems like a bonus.
RF Fit-to-car: I have tried the Pavilion in the car and it works well and has just barely enough space for my hand to pass through behind the front seat back. I know from the blog that the "Classics" might take up a little more room.
I don't care as much about:
Forward-facing longevity -- I think we will replace this seat with a Go-Hybrid for forward-facing, since that will be even easier to travel with.
No-rethread harnesses -- I'm not sure I understand the appeal. Maybe this is the sort of thing that is more of a big deal when your kid is forward-facing and so you can't just wait for a convenient time to re-thread the harness because the straps can't be below their shoulders? Or when you're transporting multiple kiddos?
HUGS -- do these really make a big safety difference? I am all for safety, but they seem like a huge pain to me -- both for the baby's comfort and the ease of use. I also suspect that they may have been part of the reason it was difficult to tighten the harness when I tried the Pavillion with my baby. I know if I have a seat that has them, I will probably remove them for RF, but I know they're required for FF on the seats that have them.
Baby is currently 10 months old and was 16 lbs and 26.5" at her 9 month check-up. She wears 12 month onesies and 9 month pants. She has kind of a big head. She has probably 2" over her head in her Aton 2.
If you were me, what would you do?
So, Britax convertible owners, which one did you pick and why? Are you happy with your decision?
I know which features each one has, so you don't need to feel obligated to explain the differences between the models. If there are fit/comfort issues that you have found, though, I'd be very interested in learning more about that.
I'm just mostly wondering how you made your decision and whether it worked out for you. What features were important to you and do you still find them as important in retrospect?
I appreciate any insights you can give. I can't tell you how much I value this community and all the patient advice that I get here. I know that my question is not new, but the ones that turned up in the search of this forum were all a couple years old and the seats have changed since then. Thanks for all you do!
EDIT
Okay, you've all been super amazing. Can I give you a few more details about our situation and see what you think?
Here are the features we're looking for:
Lightweight -- This is in favor of the Roundabout 50 Classic, right? That's the lightest, as far as I can tell from Britax's specs.
Rear-Facing Longevity -- Again in favor of the Roundabout Classic, since it's shell is an inch longer?
Easy-to-install -- Not in favor of the Classics, since they don't have the hole in the shell and cover for you to pull the belt through, right? Also the roundabout classic doesn't have lock-offs, but I'm not sure if we'd need those since we install with latch and I don't anticipate many situations where we'd be in a car so old it doesn't have a locking seatbelt. But you never know, I guess?
Easy-to-adjust -- It sounds like the harnesses are all about the same level of difficulty, but my husband is set on the click-and- safe feature (pavillion) because the seat will be in his parents' car and they have difficulty with knowing how much they need to tighten her current seat. But when I tried it out a floor model at BRU, it clicked WAY too early when the seat was installed in the car. When I plunked her in a G3 a few months ago, it was PERFECT. But I think I was also trying it out with the straps above her shoulders. Maybe when they are below it doesn't work as well? I don't want to give my in-laws a false sense of security.
Side Impact protection -- The seat will be installed outboard. The Marathons and Roundabouts all have side impact protection from their sidewalls -- are these all equivalent, though? The pictures make their sidewalls all seem to be of different depths. Also, does the "true side impact protection" in the headrest really make a difference if the kiddo is rear-facing (and therefore their head isn't above the seat anyway)? My MIL also usually likes to ride in back with her, and so the protection to her from the SICT cushions seems like a good idea, although the advocate seems like a pain.
Easy-to-load -- I am guessing that this is in direct competition with the side impact criterion but my baby is at an age where it is a struggle to get her into her car seat. She arches her back and is very resistant. She's fine once she's in it, but she's a determined little thing when you're trying to load her. This is true even though right now she's in an infant seat and we can sit right in front of her. I have no idea how we'll manage a convertible! So anything that makes loading easier (ez buckle belly pad? Harness holders?) seems like a bonus.
RF Fit-to-car: I have tried the Pavilion in the car and it works well and has just barely enough space for my hand to pass through behind the front seat back. I know from the blog that the "Classics" might take up a little more room.
I don't care as much about:
Forward-facing longevity -- I think we will replace this seat with a Go-Hybrid for forward-facing, since that will be even easier to travel with.
No-rethread harnesses -- I'm not sure I understand the appeal. Maybe this is the sort of thing that is more of a big deal when your kid is forward-facing and so you can't just wait for a convenient time to re-thread the harness because the straps can't be below their shoulders? Or when you're transporting multiple kiddos?
HUGS -- do these really make a big safety difference? I am all for safety, but they seem like a huge pain to me -- both for the baby's comfort and the ease of use. I also suspect that they may have been part of the reason it was difficult to tighten the harness when I tried the Pavillion with my baby. I know if I have a seat that has them, I will probably remove them for RF, but I know they're required for FF on the seats that have them.
Baby is currently 10 months old and was 16 lbs and 26.5" at her 9 month check-up. She wears 12 month onesies and 9 month pants. She has kind of a big head. She has probably 2" over her head in her Aton 2.
If you were me, what would you do?
Last edited: