Luv2bfishin here, responding to your comment about authorizing use of photos of my grandson. I've discussed everything with the parents, and they are okay with everything.
Actually, they thought I was alittle nuts over this whole thing, thinking I could make a difference. But as I have shown them replies to the blog, and they here all the positive comments, they are happy that some parents don't may not have to experience this horrific situation.
I'd like to particulary thank Tiffany @
http://www.freewebs.com/sacredjourneys/ and Lisa In AZ whom have who have shown me ways to get bring this issue to the next level of public scrutiny.
As for any negative impact on the family of these photos being posted on the web, I can't think of any? All the freinds and family locally have visited him and seen him firsthand. I doubt they could be used as a joke of some kind. Christopher Reeves didn't seem to have problem with showing himself in a halo. There are several images of people on Google's "images" wearing halo's.
This is all about prevention. We're not looking for sympathy. No family should endure this tragedy, and the solutions to preventing it are so easy, so obvious.....that it needs to be put into the public eye.
Recently, I have visited stores that sell carseats. I ask the salesperson what options I have for a baby that is 13 mos old and 22 lbs. They ALL told me, front facing is "okay" at that age & weight. I asked again, they are "safe in a FF car seat" at that age. And they ALL responding with some form of it's within the law.
But what if there were a sticker on the car seat that warned (as with cigarettes) that" FF your child can result in a broken neck and / or paralysis." Do you think that might prompt a parent to ask a few more questions??
That's what this is all about. not tragedy, but prevention.