Mine, too.
I just think that with the RadianSL going over 48 now it has opened a whole nother can of worms. Will latch act the same over that weight? Is that the reason why the radians now have super latch because it doesn't act the same or does the low profile of the radians make it work better with latch? I would love to be a fly on the wall in the SKJP test facility.
More food for thought (and maybe a CDN tech could correct me if I am wrong): My Canadian Radian manual (JUL2007) states "Do not use vehicle's lower universal anchorage system when installing this restraint for a child weighing more than 65lbs (30kg)."
Apparently there is no UAS/LATCH limit for the CDN manufactured Radians (max 65lbs)? Has this changed? The Radian manual does not specifically say that the vehicle may have a LATCH limit. Also, some vehicle manuals do not state the LATCH limit. The average parent wouldn't know that there is a limit for LATCH, especially if it is not stated in the vehicle manual. I guess what I am also trying to say is that this particular seat may be used over the vehicle's LATCH limit inadvertently by a fairly carseat-savvy parent, hence, the importance of testing seats this way.
Also, sooooo many people ask the question: "why can't I use the seatbelt and LATCH at the same time? Wouldn't it be safer?" Once again, I think it is interesting that TC
did test seats this way.
I think the TC study provides valuable information, but raises so many questions as evidenced here.
I am no longer able to view the videos at this time either, and also have a few more questions regarding failure of the MA in the Civic and Caravan. What I do know is that DD will no longer be riding FFing in her MA in our Civic.