thepeach80
Senior Community Member
Traffic deaths should top news
By Peter J. Woolley - Special to The Washington Post
Thursday, December 28, 2006
The nonstory of 2006 was also the nonstory of 2005. It is a nonstory every
year going back decades. Yet the number of people who die in car crashes in
the United States is staggering, even if it is absent from the agenda of
most public officials and largely ignored by the public.
When all is said and done and the ball begins to drop on New Year’s Eve,
44,000 people, give or take several hundred, will have died in auto
accidents this year. To put that number in perspective, consider that:
• At the 2006 casualty rate of 800 soldiers per year, the United States
would have to be in Iraq for more than 50 years to equal just one year of
automobile deaths back home.
• In any five-year period, the total number of traffic deaths in the United
States equals or exceeds the number of people who died in the horrific
South Asian tsunami in December 2004. U.S. traffic deaths amount to the
equivalent of two tsunamis every 10 years.
• According to the National Safety Council, your chance of dying in an
automobile crash is one in 84 over your lifetime. But your chances of
winning the Mega Millions lottery are just one in 175 million.
• If you laid out side by side 8-by-10 photos of all those killed in
crashes this year, the pictures would stretch more than five miles.
• If you made a yearbook containing the photos of those killed this year,
putting 12 photos on each page, it would have 3,500 pages. If you wanted to
limit your traffic-death yearbook to a manageable 400 pages, you’d either
have to squeeze more than 100 photos onto each page or issue an
eight-volume set.
Can you hear me now? Automobile deaths are the leading cause of death for
children, for teen-agers and in fact for all people from age 3 to 33. Yet
this annual tragedy is not a cause celebre.
Opinion leaders largely ignore the ubiquitous massacre. No marches,
walkathons, commemorative stamps or fund-raising drives are organized. It
is not brought up in the State of the Union address. It is rarely the
subject of public affairs shows. Statistics aren’t updated daily in major
newspapers or broadcasts.
Gruesome crashes are reported just one at a time, each as if it might never
happen again. Little attention is paid to the aftermath: safety measures
taken or not taken, the workings or non-workings of the justice system.
These avoidable deaths, as well as more than 2 million nonfatal
dismemberments, disfigurements and other injuries that go along with them,
have become part of the fabric of everyday life in the United States.
Elected officeholders naturally take the path of least resistance. They are
well aware that significantly reducing deaths on the roads requires radical
solutions in the form of regulation, investment and enforcement. Roads need
to be made safer, for example, by extending guardrails and medians to every
mile of busy highways. Speeding and aggressive driving need to be much more
rigorously controlled. Trucks need to be separated from automobiles
wherever possible. And cars need to be built slower and stronger.
But every solution is readily opposed by someone: manufacturers, industrial
unions, truckers, consumers, taxpayers — though all are potential victims
themselves. The public is not to blame. It is hemmed in on every side by
mind-numbing advertising and shouted stories of the moment. Apparently no
medium is willing to bludgeon people — as they need to be — with statistics
and trends on the dangers facing them every time they set out in their
automobiles.
Only if there is a public outcry will this situation get the attention due
it. Only when people fully realize the absurd and avoidable costs of the
dangers that stalk them on the road — and then demand governmental action
in the form of forceful intervention and strict regulation — will this
become the story of the year, as it should be.
— Peter J. Woolley is a professor of political science at Fairleigh
Dickinson University and executive director of PublicMind, a public opinion
research group there.
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/dec/28/traffic_deaths_should_top_news/
By Peter J. Woolley - Special to The Washington Post
Thursday, December 28, 2006
The nonstory of 2006 was also the nonstory of 2005. It is a nonstory every
year going back decades. Yet the number of people who die in car crashes in
the United States is staggering, even if it is absent from the agenda of
most public officials and largely ignored by the public.
When all is said and done and the ball begins to drop on New Year’s Eve,
44,000 people, give or take several hundred, will have died in auto
accidents this year. To put that number in perspective, consider that:
• At the 2006 casualty rate of 800 soldiers per year, the United States
would have to be in Iraq for more than 50 years to equal just one year of
automobile deaths back home.
• In any five-year period, the total number of traffic deaths in the United
States equals or exceeds the number of people who died in the horrific
South Asian tsunami in December 2004. U.S. traffic deaths amount to the
equivalent of two tsunamis every 10 years.
• According to the National Safety Council, your chance of dying in an
automobile crash is one in 84 over your lifetime. But your chances of
winning the Mega Millions lottery are just one in 175 million.
• If you laid out side by side 8-by-10 photos of all those killed in
crashes this year, the pictures would stretch more than five miles.
• If you made a yearbook containing the photos of those killed this year,
putting 12 photos on each page, it would have 3,500 pages. If you wanted to
limit your traffic-death yearbook to a manageable 400 pages, you’d either
have to squeeze more than 100 photos onto each page or issue an
eight-volume set.
Can you hear me now? Automobile deaths are the leading cause of death for
children, for teen-agers and in fact for all people from age 3 to 33. Yet
this annual tragedy is not a cause celebre.
Opinion leaders largely ignore the ubiquitous massacre. No marches,
walkathons, commemorative stamps or fund-raising drives are organized. It
is not brought up in the State of the Union address. It is rarely the
subject of public affairs shows. Statistics aren’t updated daily in major
newspapers or broadcasts.
Gruesome crashes are reported just one at a time, each as if it might never
happen again. Little attention is paid to the aftermath: safety measures
taken or not taken, the workings or non-workings of the justice system.
These avoidable deaths, as well as more than 2 million nonfatal
dismemberments, disfigurements and other injuries that go along with them,
have become part of the fabric of everyday life in the United States.
Elected officeholders naturally take the path of least resistance. They are
well aware that significantly reducing deaths on the roads requires radical
solutions in the form of regulation, investment and enforcement. Roads need
to be made safer, for example, by extending guardrails and medians to every
mile of busy highways. Speeding and aggressive driving need to be much more
rigorously controlled. Trucks need to be separated from automobiles
wherever possible. And cars need to be built slower and stronger.
But every solution is readily opposed by someone: manufacturers, industrial
unions, truckers, consumers, taxpayers — though all are potential victims
themselves. The public is not to blame. It is hemmed in on every side by
mind-numbing advertising and shouted stories of the moment. Apparently no
medium is willing to bludgeon people — as they need to be — with statistics
and trends on the dangers facing them every time they set out in their
automobiles.
Only if there is a public outcry will this situation get the attention due
it. Only when people fully realize the absurd and avoidable costs of the
dangers that stalk them on the road — and then demand governmental action
in the form of forceful intervention and strict regulation — will this
become the story of the year, as it should be.
— Peter J. Woolley is a professor of political science at Fairleigh
Dickinson University and executive director of PublicMind, a public opinion
research group there.
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2006/dec/28/traffic_deaths_should_top_news/
