This is more a matter of curiosity, but I was wondering if there is a breakdown anywhere of the crash statistics that are used to get the "500% safer rear-facing" quote. The reason I ask is that I have my 2 year old rear-facing still, but I sometimes wonder about the fact that in the ten years I have been driving in Los Angeles, I have been rear-ended 3 times, but never had a frontal crash. I was curious if this is just an oddity, or if it is somehow representative of the type of driving we do here (mainly freeways). I understand that generally the impacts are greater in frontal crashes, so ERF is still the best thing to do, but I'm curious if urban driving leads to different crash statistics than everywhere else. Or maybe it's just that LA drivers are incredibly bad