christineka
New member
I find that people's rfing goals seem to be scewed by their child's size and available car seats. I want to discuss ideals.
The US study on rear-facing only studied kids up to age 2 and found rfing to be safest for that age group.
The European study only studied kids through age 4 (pretty sure) and found rear-facing to be safest.
We've been saying for some time now that rear-facing is safest for everyone.
Why would you want to turn a kid forward facing before they reach the rear-facing limit on their car seat?
How do you think this works with lightweight kiddos? Are older lightweight kiddos just as safe ffing than their average weighted peers?
If there was no limit on weight/height and you didn't have to buy a new car seat, what age would you turn your kid ffing?
The US study on rear-facing only studied kids up to age 2 and found rfing to be safest for that age group.
The European study only studied kids through age 4 (pretty sure) and found rear-facing to be safest.
We've been saying for some time now that rear-facing is safest for everyone.
Why would you want to turn a kid forward facing before they reach the rear-facing limit on their car seat?
How do you think this works with lightweight kiddos? Are older lightweight kiddos just as safe ffing than their average weighted peers?
If there was no limit on weight/height and you didn't have to buy a new car seat, what age would you turn your kid ffing?