rodentranger
New member
regarding rf tethering vs. not tethering.
Neither of them believe that rebound/cocooning can possibly be as safe as a tethered seat.
Dh is coming from a "logic" aspect ("How can allowing the seat to move be better than keeping the seat and therefore the occupant stationary? I wear my seat belt to hold me into my seat. It doesn't move.") and BIL is coming from the viewpoint of having worked on race teams and race seat safety.
Can anyone link me to studies with hard data? Front impact, rear impact, side impact....Are most of the crash tests done at 38 mph? Are there any "real life" statistics?
Neither of them believe that rebound/cocooning can possibly be as safe as a tethered seat.
Dh is coming from a "logic" aspect ("How can allowing the seat to move be better than keeping the seat and therefore the occupant stationary? I wear my seat belt to hold me into my seat. It doesn't move.") and BIL is coming from the viewpoint of having worked on race teams and race seat safety.
Can anyone link me to studies with hard data? Front impact, rear impact, side impact....Are most of the crash tests done at 38 mph? Are there any "real life" statistics?