How come we have seats that harness to 80lbs, and we can't get that RF limit to go up higher? It doesn't seem to make sense, since from what I understand the benefits of ERF are very well establish while there is some controversy about the benefits of HWH. Do we need the ERF version of the Kyle Miller video to get people going and up the demand for higher RF limits? I know 35lbs is already better than what we've had in the past, but c'mon if even a Scenera can go to 35lbs you'd think Britax could easily do 40, right?
Any thoughts?
Ok, I know I'm cheating. I had started the same thread last week but it had a weird title and I think that might be why no one responded. So I'm trying again! I started thinking this because I had this dream: I was driving and saw someone using a Regent RF. I tried to explain they couldn't do it but they insisted they heard RF was safer so that's how they wanted their son to ride, and he couldn't fit in any other carseat RF.
On a fun note, dd got weighed yesterday and she's now officially extended rear facing!!! Wohooo! (check my new siggy)
__________________
Any thoughts?
Ok, I know I'm cheating. I had started the same thread last week but it had a weird title and I think that might be why no one responded. So I'm trying again! I started thinking this because I had this dream: I was driving and saw someone using a Regent RF. I tried to explain they couldn't do it but they insisted they heard RF was safer so that's how they wanted their son to ride, and he couldn't fit in any other carseat RF.
On a fun note, dd got weighed yesterday and she's now officially extended rear facing!!! Wohooo! (check my new siggy)
__________________