Do typical Swedish people really RF to 5 or 6 then booster? What I'd seen is more RF to 4yo then booster.
Who cares if it is "typical" or not?
I'm guessing that how "typical" it is to RF to age 5 or 6 and then to booster versus how "typical" it is to RF to age 4 and then to booster is probably similar to how "typical" it is to see North Americans RF to age 2 versus age 4. It probably
isn't "typical" for Swedish people to RF to age 5 or 6, but that doesn't mean it isn't okay to like the
idea of it, just like how it isn't "typical" for North Americans to RF to age 4, but it is okay to like the
idea of it.
It seems to me that you questioning if the above idea is "typical" is similar to someone in Europe saying they like the idea of North Americans RF to age 4 and you questioning if that is truly typical because what you've seen more often is people RF to age 2. :shrug-shoulders: Does that mean that just because you haven't seen many people RF to age 4 doesn't mean the person can't like the idea that
some people might RF to age 4? Of course not. So the same goes for what I said above. Just because it isn't typical doesn't mean it doesn't happen. I am still entitled to like the idea.
I only know (in real life) two Swedish families and one family rear-faced their youngest to age 3 or 4 in a US seat, then to just under 6 in a Swedish seat. The other family rear-faced their second child to around age 5.5 and the youngest is still RF at age 3.5 (and I'm assuming they are going to keep going).
I don't know if that is "typical" or not. I was just saying I like the
idea of that.
). I love the idea of RF until age 5-6 and then going into a booster.
