Lately I have been watching alot of crash tests. I have been trying to decide between a Como and a BV for DD...
I found a picture of Jackson in a BV. He was sitting the way he normally sits in the MA and BV and his head was completely out of the wings. If we were to be in a side impact at the specific second, I doubt they would have done him little, if any, good. I would hazard a guess that the MA would preform just as good as a BV in a side impact with the child's head out of the wings (for us is about 90% of the time)
Also including a pic of him in the Como and he always sits like this in the Como because of how the seat is reclined, it is most comfortable with his head resting on the back of the seat. So maybe a Como/Signo would be better in terms of SIP.( I know that this would all be largely conjecture)
Anyway, I was wondering if any of the techs (or others) had thoughts on this.
I found a picture of Jackson in a BV. He was sitting the way he normally sits in the MA and BV and his head was completely out of the wings. If we were to be in a side impact at the specific second, I doubt they would have done him little, if any, good. I would hazard a guess that the MA would preform just as good as a BV in a side impact with the child's head out of the wings (for us is about 90% of the time)
Also including a pic of him in the Como and he always sits like this in the Como because of how the seat is reclined, it is most comfortable with his head resting on the back of the seat. So maybe a Como/Signo would be better in terms of SIP.( I know that this would all be largely conjecture)
Anyway, I was wondering if any of the techs (or others) had thoughts on this.