Please explain this statement to me...
DS is almost 6.5 and still harnessed full time. He is very small for his age, and very light. I understand the head excursion argument for a very heavy child, but for a child his age/size please discuss with me why having him harnessed offers "NO" protection. I've seen crash tests and children sliding out the side of a booster.
The last time I went to read about this topic there were lots of opinions on the matter, but not very much research to back up either way. Is there now???
DS does ride in a booster in grandparent's cars, but loves his FR85 and I'm in no hurry to switch.
DS is almost 6.5 and still harnessed full time. He is very small for his age, and very light. I understand the head excursion argument for a very heavy child, but for a child his age/size please discuss with me why having him harnessed offers "NO" protection. I've seen crash tests and children sliding out the side of a booster.
The last time I went to read about this topic there were lots of opinions on the matter, but not very much research to back up either way. Is there now???
DS does ride in a booster in grandparent's cars, but loves his FR85 and I'm in no hurry to switch.