This may be a simple question, but why is the "wedge" or Angle Adjuster by Diono safe?
I've been reading about the concerns re seat protectors (how thin is thin, flexible vs. rigid, etc.) If you accept that an interpositional material may affect the rigidity/tightness of an install, it doesn't make sense to me that a slab of PU foam 1.5" thick (or thicker) under a carseat base is going to result in a tight enough install by the seat protector "standard." It may be high density foam, but to a first approximation it will not behave as a rigid body under extreme loads.
Conversely, if you accept that the AA is safe for use in a RF install, why couldn't you also achieve a comparably tight install in FF configuration? Of course, I'm looking for an explanation more substantive than "the company says it's safe for RF only, so it must be so."
What am I missing?
?
I've been reading about the concerns re seat protectors (how thin is thin, flexible vs. rigid, etc.) If you accept that an interpositional material may affect the rigidity/tightness of an install, it doesn't make sense to me that a slab of PU foam 1.5" thick (or thicker) under a carseat base is going to result in a tight enough install by the seat protector "standard." It may be high density foam, but to a first approximation it will not behave as a rigid body under extreme loads.
Conversely, if you accept that the AA is safe for use in a RF install, why couldn't you also achieve a comparably tight install in FF configuration? Of course, I'm looking for an explanation more substantive than "the company says it's safe for RF only, so it must be so."
What am I missing?
?