Melizerd
New member
"Hey ladies!
For anyone considering the FPSVD vs the Marathon, I wanted to share what I learned today.
I personally could not come to grips with the fact that 2 car seats with the exact same shell could have 1 with rear facing tether ability and 1 without. So, I finally got off my butt and called Britax to find out what specifically is the difference between the two that causes this phenomenon. Here is the info that I learned today.
1. The FPSVD is not even tested for rear facing tether. It's just an expense that they don't add in, keeps the cost down, differentiates it from the higher priced Britax name.
2. It is NOT the same shell as the Marathon. They would not tell me what specifically is different, all they would tell me is that it is not the same.
The difference in the shell coupled with not testing the rear facing tether is why they do not recommend tethering rear facing. I suggested that they remove the line about ensuring proper back angle when tethering rear facing to avoid confusion, but I think that suggestion fell on deaf ears.
I am still very happy with my FPSVD (my car doesn't have rear facing tether ability anyway) and the safety tests that were run on it. I still believe it is an excellent deal and an excellent car seat for the money. I just wanted to pass this info along since it was something that had bothered me all along. If you can afford it, the Britax is better. You are paying for more than just the name (which was my initial assumption).
Hope this info helps someone "
All of that is from a different board, where I had been telling people that the shell is basically the MA shell. So what do ya think?
I did tell her pretty much all cars can tether RFing even if there isn't dedicated anchors.
For anyone considering the FPSVD vs the Marathon, I wanted to share what I learned today.
I personally could not come to grips with the fact that 2 car seats with the exact same shell could have 1 with rear facing tether ability and 1 without. So, I finally got off my butt and called Britax to find out what specifically is the difference between the two that causes this phenomenon. Here is the info that I learned today.
1. The FPSVD is not even tested for rear facing tether. It's just an expense that they don't add in, keeps the cost down, differentiates it from the higher priced Britax name.
2. It is NOT the same shell as the Marathon. They would not tell me what specifically is different, all they would tell me is that it is not the same.
The difference in the shell coupled with not testing the rear facing tether is why they do not recommend tethering rear facing. I suggested that they remove the line about ensuring proper back angle when tethering rear facing to avoid confusion, but I think that suggestion fell on deaf ears.
I am still very happy with my FPSVD (my car doesn't have rear facing tether ability anyway) and the safety tests that were run on it. I still believe it is an excellent deal and an excellent car seat for the money. I just wanted to pass this info along since it was something that had bothered me all along. If you can afford it, the Britax is better. You are paying for more than just the name (which was my initial assumption).
Hope this info helps someone "
All of that is from a different board, where I had been telling people that the shell is basically the MA shell. So what do ya think?
I did tell her pretty much all cars can tether RFing even if there isn't dedicated anchors.