Chrissy
New member
I had both of these in my possession today, so I decided to take some side by side pictures to compare these two cheap high back booster options.
Lowest setting. Notice that head wings on Turbo dip MUCH lower than the Big Kid.
Highest setting. Notice that the Pink Big Kid Booster lengthens at the waist area, and the Turbo lengthens at the shoulders.
Rear view in highest setting:
Back to back in highest setting. Compares head wing depth, height of arm rests (both are in highest position), straight back of Turbo and curved back of Big Kid.
Top view: Notice thickness of head wings - this is because the Turbobooster has foam covering the entire head wing area and the Big Kid is just plastic. Notice how the seat of the Turbo goes all the way up against the "seat back" (my couch), and the Big Kid sticks out because of the curved back. Also this causes the seat to be pushed further forward toward the front edge of the vehicle seat.
If anyone wants any other comparison photos let me know ASAP. The pink Big Kid booster is going to DD's friend tomorrow.
Lowest setting. Notice that head wings on Turbo dip MUCH lower than the Big Kid.
Highest setting. Notice that the Pink Big Kid Booster lengthens at the waist area, and the Turbo lengthens at the shoulders.
Rear view in highest setting:
Back to back in highest setting. Compares head wing depth, height of arm rests (both are in highest position), straight back of Turbo and curved back of Big Kid.
Top view: Notice thickness of head wings - this is because the Turbobooster has foam covering the entire head wing area and the Big Kid is just plastic. Notice how the seat of the Turbo goes all the way up against the "seat back" (my couch), and the Big Kid sticks out because of the curved back. Also this causes the seat to be pushed further forward toward the front edge of the vehicle seat.
If anyone wants any other comparison photos let me know ASAP. The pink Big Kid booster is going to DD's friend tomorrow.