luckyclov
New member
Let me start off by saying that I am *well aware* that SB failure is extremely rare. That's not entirely the subject of my question, but I wasn't sure what else to title the thread.
Anyways.
I'm sure we're all familiar with the tragic story of Kyle David Miller. It was actually that video that closed my decision on sending my DD from a Marathon to a Regent. Harnessing beyond 4/40 has benefits, sure, we all know that.
Say, though, we've got a 50-lb child in a harnessed car seat - obviously the car seat is SB installed. If there was an accident, and the SB failed, aren't we, technically, in a similar situation as a child in a booster, whose SB fails? Or does it make a difference having the child attached to a restraint that's (hopefully) TT'ed?
Help me understand...?
Anyways.
I'm sure we're all familiar with the tragic story of Kyle David Miller. It was actually that video that closed my decision on sending my DD from a Marathon to a Regent. Harnessing beyond 4/40 has benefits, sure, we all know that.
Say, though, we've got a 50-lb child in a harnessed car seat - obviously the car seat is SB installed. If there was an accident, and the SB failed, aren't we, technically, in a similar situation as a child in a booster, whose SB fails? Or does it make a difference having the child attached to a restraint that's (hopefully) TT'ed?
Help me understand...?