I was reading the Metro today and found this article: http://www.metronews.ca/toronto/live/article/507477--steps-to-ensure-child-seat-safety
I was sad that they didn't use it to tell that rear-facing is safer, but I was REALLY upset by this line about booster use:
I was bothered by the implication that kids shouldn't need to use a booster seat at age 8, which is what *I* took away from the 'College is right around the corner' comment. That it's a 'baby' thing to need a booster.
Am I over-reacting? Or should I write a letter to the paper?
I was sad that they didn't use it to tell that rear-facing is safer, but I was REALLY upset by this line about booster use:
Should little Stewie outgrow a forward-facing child seat prematurely, he’ll require a booster seat. Only once he turns 8, weighs more than 80 pounds or stands taller than 4’9” is he ready for normal seating like the big kids. College is right around the corner.
I was bothered by the implication that kids shouldn't need to use a booster seat at age 8, which is what *I* took away from the 'College is right around the corner' comment. That it's a 'baby' thing to need a booster.
Am I over-reacting? Or should I write a letter to the paper?