Momof4Girls
New member
This is a futuristic theoretical question at this point.
My 3.5 y/o will easily RF until she's old enough to booster, even in a 33lbs Britax seat (no, it won't expire before then either!).
She has mild low tone, blood sugar regulation problems (low), testing pending for a mitochondrial defect (the point being that her issues could, ultimately, be progressive). She also has a 95% or higher head circumference.
Ultimately what I'm asking here is what is the neck load difference between HBB and FF harness? I have read here that the Swedes go RF to HBB because of neck load issues...has that research panned out elsewhere? Just pondering...
My 3.5 y/o will easily RF until she's old enough to booster, even in a 33lbs Britax seat (no, it won't expire before then either!).
She has mild low tone, blood sugar regulation problems (low), testing pending for a mitochondrial defect (the point being that her issues could, ultimately, be progressive). She also has a 95% or higher head circumference.
Ultimately what I'm asking here is what is the neck load difference between HBB and FF harness? I have read here that the Swedes go RF to HBB because of neck load issues...has that research panned out elsewhere? Just pondering...
In side impact crashes, rear facing I think has been proved safer. Now, the Swedish studies, are compelling. Don't know how to go about extrapolating the facts though.
