What should I buy??

[Dragonflymama]

Looking for: (1) good safety features (including side-curtain airbags) (2) reasonable fuel efficiency and lower emissions (3) seating for 6-7 (4) good handling and tight turning radius. I currently commute 18 miles each way to the office, 5-6 days a week (90% freeway). DD commutes with me (onsite childcare). Currently drive a Ford Escape and have been generally happy with it except: (1) my '02 model does not have side curtain air bags (2) 6 cyl fuel economy is not great and (3) only seats 5 (uncomfortably 3 in rear due to DDs carseat). We are a family of 4 but often have nephews or carpool kids along and need at least one family vehicle that seats more than 5.

I was seriously considering a Ford Freestyle until they discontinued it and I am having trouble finding one to buy that has the center-row two bucket seat configuration. Wondering if I want to buy a car in its last model year (concerned about parts availability and service issues). Do you think this is a valid concern?

We have rented various full-sized minivans and I don’t really like driving them (I'm used to the handling, visibility and parking ease of a smaller vehicle/wheel-base).
I do not like a full-sized truck frame due to stiff handling and my perception of higher center of gravity and roll-over risk (but a unibody type small-truck platform like the Escape drives more like a car and I am ok with that).

I'd like to stay under $30K. Also, prefer UAW-assembled but not a deal breaker (grandparents were Polish immigrants who made their life here as lifelong UAW workers).
EDITTED TO ADD: This will be the vehicle that 15.5 yo DSS will be learning to drive when he gets his permit (too soon) and completes the drivers ed course) so any additional considerations there would be welcome. Also, this will be our family's primary transport vehicle as our other vehicle is a p/u truck DH drives for work.
So, any suggestions that meet my needs and preferences?
So, any suggestions that meet my needs and preferences?

[bensmom243]

How about the GMC Acadia (might be a bit more than 30K) or the Saturn Outlook? They both seem very roomy and probably similar in size to the Freestyle. Do you need AWD?

[southpawboston]

mazda5:

- reasonable, but not stellar gas mileage (27 mpg hwy)

- ULEV-rated for emmissions, one notch below the cleanest

- seats 6 standard

- has a really tight turning radius (tighter than any other van/SUV on the US market)

- handles better than any van/SUV on the US market

- has side curtains airbags for all three rows, and although not yet crash tested in the US, got top ratings in BOTH japanese AND european tests.

- dirt cheap... under $20k to start, and you can get the top model with navigation and leather for under $24k.

on the downside, it's not as powerful as most other vans/SUVs out there and it's definitely on the smaller side, with very little trunk space with the third row up. and it's not UAW-assembled, as it is made in japan. also no stability control, not even optional.

[Dragonflymama]

Thank you for the good suggestions, I'll check these two vehicles out.

Do we need AWD? Define "need" LOL... I think we would be ok with a good frontWD, but my DH seems to think that we have to have AWD. We do go up to the mountains/snow a lot during the winter months (snow sports) and camp/hike/enjoy outdoors year-round. But honestly, I think we only need AWD or 4WD on very rare occassions (severe winter weather when renting ski cabins off the beaten path) and even then if good FWD would not get us out safely, we might be well-advised to stay put until the storm passes and the plows come out. But I have not convinced my DH of this yet. :rolleyes:

In the past, I lived years in both the Black Hills and also in Boulder Colorado with only FWD and I could get around just fine through pretty tough mountain winter weather. DH is a Califonia boy and seems to think outdoors = 4WD.

I love the idea of better fuel efficiency with FWD vs AWD.

[Dragonflymama]

mazda5:

- dirt cheap... under $20k to start, and you can get the top model with navigation and leather for under $24k.

on the downside, it's not as powerful as most other vans/SUVs out there and it's definitely on the smaller side, with very little trunk space with the third row up. and it's not UAW-assembled, as it is made in japan. also no stability control, not even optional.

Thanks SouthPaw, I had no idea the Mazda5 was so afforable. I'll add it to my short-list to compare.

UAW is a feel-good extra, but not a requirement. I've owned Opal, VW Jetta and Mazda 323 in the past.

[southpawboston]

i was wrong on the emissions... it's LEV-rated, not ULEV. so it's two notches from the best, and probably in the same league as most other vans/small SUVs...

base price is actually just $19k with auto transmission, and $25k gets you everything, including navigation and DVD entertainment. :)

[jen_nah]

Are you sure they are discontinuing the Freestyle? I had heard they were redesigning it and rebadging it under a new name. I'll have to have dh check this out.

[jen_nah]

Autoblog states the Freestyle will remain.

http://www.autoblog.com/2006/02/09/ford-freestyle-back-on-the-table-mercury-version-off/

http://chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/news.pl?id=19453

[Dragonflymama]

Great news! Now I wonder why the dealership around me dont have much inventory???

Thanks for the heads up!

[jen_nah]

Great news! Now I wonder why the dealership around me dont have much inventory???

Thanks for the heads up!

It could be because it is almost the end of the model year. New year models are released late August/early Sept. You could also have the dealer search for the model with the options you want too. So, Even if your local dealer doesn't have a good stock another dealer within a 500mile radius might have one you want.

[Defrost]

If you decide on the Mazda5, check out my recent thread (http://www.car-seat.org/showthread.php?t=18200) about the third-row seat belts. It may not be a problem depending on the ages of kids you're hauling - if they're teens you should be fine, or if they're still in harnessed seats it's not a problem.

Otherwise I love it! It's got an awesome turning radius and I love the gas mileage. Someone else posted that they are correcting my only other complaints in the '08 model - it's getting a passenger armrest and rear air vents.

[southpawboston]

the '08 model - it's getting a passenger armrest and rear air vents.

those were my biggest complaints about it as well.

[Loves2sing]

Are you sure they are discontinuing the Freestyle? I had heard they were redesigning it and rebadging it under a new name. I'll have to have dh check this out.

The only manufacturers that are still going to continue making minivans, are the imports, and Dodge. GM and Ford are giving up the lost cause of Mini-vans, because they can't compete with the other makes. This is according to all my dh'd MANY MANY car magazines. (Car & Driver, Motor Trend, Motor World, and more)

The 2009 Ford Flex is the new shape of the people mover at Ford.



Consumer Guide's Impressions of the 2009 Ford Flex

Flex signifies the demise of Ford's minivans. Thank goodness. Production ends on the slow-selling Ford Freestar and Mercury Monterey during 2007, leaving room for this not-so-soccer-momish people mover.

The Flex is an ugly new SUV that replaces Ford and Mercury's Minivans.

AUTOWEEK

December 9, 2006

General Motors plans to cancel its next-generation minivans and abandon that vehicle segment.

Instead it will try to woo buyers with its midsized, Lambda-based crossover vehicles, sources say. The minivans had been scheduled for the 2010 model year.

This makes it sound like they will be renewing their Minivans in 2010. But the other sources make it sound like a mid-sized crossover vehicle will be replacing the vans. I don't know, i should ask dh. He's the one cheering that less Minivans will be on the road!:whistle: LOL! (Why do you think we have such a huge truck? LOL)

[twokidstwodogs]

How about a Toyota RAV-4? A third row is a option for it, though I have a hard time believing that adults would be comfortable in the third row of a car as small as the RAV-4. It has side curtain airbags with rollover sensors for at least the front two rows, and it also has electronic stability control. Crash test ratings are pretty good, and the gas mileage is reasonable. Plus, it should be reliable and fun to drive. If you don't go crazy with options, you should be able to keep it under 30K.

FWIW, I would not put a new driver in a car without electronic stability control if I could help it. The Mazda5 really should have it.

[Dragonflymama]

FWIW, I would not put a new driver in a car without electronic stability control if I could help it. The Mazda5 really should have it.

Electronic stability control is a great thing to keep in mind for our soon-to-be-driving teen. Thanks!

The only manufacturers that are still going to continue making minivans, are the imports, and Dodge. GM and Ford are giving up the lost cause of Mini-vans, because they can't compete with the other makes. This is according to all my dh'd MANY MANY car magazines. (Car & Driver, Motor Trend, Motor World, and more)

BTW, the Ford FreeSTYLE is a crossover/AWD wagon, not a van (despite the misleading similarity to the FreeSTAR minivan name).

[southpawboston]

FWIW, I would not put a new driver in a car without electronic stability control if I could help it. The Mazda5 really should have it.

yes it should, but then again, i still have more faith in some cars without ESC than some cars WITH ESC. it is not a guarantee against losing control and it has much more benefit on larger, top-heavy, poor-handling vehicles like SUVs than it does on smaller, lighter cars that handle well to begin with.

MIL's CRV has ESC and i don't feel nearly as in control driving it as i do my car, which lacks ESC. in fact i have intentionally put the CRV's ESC to the test, and it wasn't able to save me from putting the car into an intentional spin :)

[Namegirl]

Another vote for the Mazda 5! The sliding doors are great (the Freestyle has regular doors).

[twokidstwodogs]

yes it should, but then again, i still have more faith in some cars without ESC than some cars WITH ESC. it is not a guarantee against losing control and it has much more benefit on larger, top-heavy, poor-handling vehicles like SUVs than it does on smaller, lighter cars that handle well to begin with.

I agree. I bought a Legacy last year despite its lack of ESC. (I was, however, annoyed that Subaru didn't have it as an option on the wagon.) But a Legacy without ESC has a better NHTSA rollover rating than most cars *with* ESC, even passenger cars. That Subaru low center of gravity makes a huge difference. I still would have liked to have it, though.

The lack of ESC on the Mazda5 was one of the things that put it out of contention for me; I really think that even a small van like that needs it. And I also think that teenage drivers would also benefit from the course correction features of ESC.

[Defrost]

The lack of ESC on the Mazda5 was one of the things that put it out of contention for me; I really think that even a small van like that needs it. And I also think that teenage drivers would also benefit from the course correction features of ESC.

I'm really not familiar enough with ESC to say for sure, but you might want to try driving it. I've driven both my friends' minivans (a Kia Sedona and a Chryster T&C) and while they are much more care-like than my old AstroVan, my Mazda5 doesn't drive like them. It's also much shorter (height and length). It really feels more like a station wagon than a minivan.

Like I said, I don't know if ESC would make it even better, but even though they are calling it a minivan, it's not a minivan. It's a station wagon with two seats in the cargo hold! ;)

[southpawboston]

but even though they are calling it a minivan, it's not a minivan. It's a station wagon with two seats in the cargo hold! ;)

it's the only minivan, IIRC, that is listed as a "passenger car" and not a "van". it is based on a mazda3 passenger car platform, and mechanically, it is nearly identical. it just has a slightly taller body.

[twokidstwodogs]

it's the only minivan, IIRC, that is listed as a "passenger car" and not a "van". it is based on a mazda3 passenger car platform, and mechanically, it is nearly identical. it just has a slightly taller body.

Don't get me wrong--I think the Mazda5 is an awesome car! But of course, the taller body affects the center of gravity. My old Forester was also rated as a small station wagon by the EPA, not an SUV. (Subaru might have changed that by now, but that's how it used to be.) But it still is more susceptible to rolling than a Legacy.

The ESC wasn't the only thing keeping me from buying a Mazda5. If it had suited my needs better, I would have probably bought one anyway. But like my Legacy, it would be better off with ESC as an option. I'm actually surprised that Mazda hasn't put it on there yet, given the folks to whom it's marketed. Folks who don't like it can always turn it off.

[southpawboston]

I'm actually surprised that Mazda hasn't put it on there yet, given the folks to whom it's marketed. Folks who don't like it can always turn it off.

i am frankly surprised as well. it's purely marketing, nothing else. they decided to add it as an option to the 2007 3 (i have a 2006 :rolleyes:) along with tire pressure monitoring. there's no reason they couldn't have slapped it on the 5 as well... many of the mechanical parts and electronics are *there* already, it's just a matter of adding a few sensors and integrating it all in.

[jen_nah]

I personally don't like the looks of the Mazda5 but that is my personal opinion. I do however like the CX-9 but I think one of Mazda's down falls is the same front end design on all most all their vehicles. They need some styling differances between all the models IMO. I would (but dh would never) consider a Mazda only because Ford owns the majority of the company.

[southpawboston]

I would (but dh would never) consider a Mazda only because Ford owns the majority of the company.

:eek: yes, ford the corporation owns a controlling share of mazda, and therefore take some of the profits, but you do realize that the parts contents are like 90% japanese, right? so all those japanese parts suppliers are profiting. and the cars are not assembled by UAW workers, robbing US workers of jobs. the japanese economy is being fed.

so by your logic, it should be even better for corporate ford for consumers to buy a volvo or jaguar... both of which are 100% owned by ford. so even more profits feeding back into ford than with mazda.

and the flip side of that logic would be that you shouldn't buy a chrysler product--despite that they are assembled in the US by US workers and the parts come mostly from the US--because all of the profits are going to a german company (which owns chrysler outright, not just a controlling share).

[Jeanum]

I read in the Detroit Free Press a couple of days ago that the Ford Freestyle has been re-engineered and its model name has been changed to the Taurus X for the 2008 model year. Here's a link to the article, which also touts the '08 model's IIHS top pick safety rating: :thumbsup: http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=200770625051.

The Ford 500 sedan will also be renamed the Taurus. My head is spinning with the confusing model name changes. :dizzy:

[Dragonflymama]

Cool! I had heard of the upcoming Taurus X but I did not realize that it was the Freestyle. Now I am excited to test drive that vehicle. Maybe we should wait until next spring to buy (to give Ford a chance to "fix" any issues that coem with the new engine and tranny in this platform)?? Btu I want a new car now!

I am so happy to hear that this will be an option to consider. It will likely be right at the top of my budget line, but ok, at least it is a vehicle that both DH and I agree on (not many of those :( )